d04 ex02 ok, presque rien a changer ou je me trompe ?

d04/ex01/srcs/Dog.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+#include "Dog.hpp"
+
+#define COPLIEN_COLOR B_CYAN
+
+/*********************************************
+ * CONSTRUCTORS
+ *********************************************/
+
+Dog::Dog() {
+	std::cout << COPLIEN_COLOR "Dog constructor" RESET "\n";
+	type = "dog";
+	_brain = new Brain();
+	return;
+}
+
+Dog::Dog( Brain *brain ) {
+	std::cout << COPLIEN_COLOR "Dog constructor" RESET "\n";
+	type = "dog";
+	_brain = new Brain();
+	*_brain = *brain;
+	return;
+}
+
+/*
+error: base class ‘class Animal’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Werror=extra]
+Dog::Dog( Dog const & src ) {
+^~~
+answer : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43612772/base-class-class-a-should-be-explicitly-initialized-in-the-copy-constructor
+*/
+Dog::Dog( Dog const & src ) : Animal() {
+	std::cout << COPLIEN_COLOR "Dog copy constructor" RESET "\n";
+	*this = src;
+	return;
+}
+
+/*********************************************
+ * DESTRUCTORS
+ *********************************************/
+
+Dog::~Dog() {
+	std::cout << COPLIEN_COLOR "Dog destructor" RESET "\n";
+	delete _brain;
+	return;
+}
+
+/*********************************************
+ * OPERATORS
+ *********************************************/
+
+Dog &	Dog::operator=( Dog const & rhs ) {
+	Animal::operator=(rhs);
+	_brain = new Brain();
+	if (this != &rhs)
+		_brain = rhs._brain;
+	return *this;
+}
+
+/*********************************************
+ * PUBLIC MEMBER FUNCTIONS
+ *********************************************/
+
+void	Dog::makeSound() const {
+	std::cout << "*woof*\n";
+}
+